Religion, Identity and Solidarity: Emile Durkheim's Perspective

  • Farrid Mustofa Leipzieg University, Germany

Abstract

This study analyzes the ritual community as an association of people who try to get closer to God through religious rituals. The focus of the community is not to carry out joint rituals but on studies, sharing religious experiences, and how to increase religious obedience. There are two types of ritual communities; those formed by religious leadership and by similar interests in studying religion. This study examines the second community, by examining the values, principles, and beliefs that unite community members. Research is needed to understand religious phenomena, increase understanding, and religious tolerance. The study was conducted by library study of ritual community, in this case, the community of Salat Khusuk, and Emile Durkheim's theory contained in The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Descriptions, interpretations, historical continuity, internal coherence, and holistic are methodical elements in this study. The results of the study show that the attachment and social relations of the community are built by the value of identity and inward solidarity inherent in each member of the ritual community.

References

Akram, M. (2016). Emergence of the Modern Academic Study of Religion: An Analytical Survey of Various Interpretations. Islamic Studies, 9-31.

Aldous, J., Durkheim, E., & Tonnies, F. (1972). An exchange between Durkheim and Tonnies on the nature of social relations, with an introduction by Joan Aldous. American Journal of Sociology, 77(6), 1191-1200.

Basedau, M., Gobien, S., & Prediger, S. (2017). The ambivalent role of religion for sustainable development: a review of the empirical evidence. 1-65.

Baum, G. (1975). Religion and Alienation: A Theological Reading of Sociology. New York: Paulist Press.

Bellah, R. N. (Ed.). (1973). Emile Durkheim on Morality and Society. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Campbel, T. (2001). Tujuh Teori Sosial, pent, Budi Hardiman. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Durkheim, E. (1964). The Division of Labour in Society, Translated by George Simpson. New York: Free Press.

Durkheim, E. (1954). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Joseph Ward Swain (trans). London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

Dzulfikar, C. M. (2014). Pemikiran Emile Durkheim. Retrieved from http://charlie-muhammad.blogspot.com/2012/04/pemik iran-emile-durkheim.html

Emirbayer, M. (2003). Emile Durkheim: Sociologist of Modernity. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Giddens, A. (1986). Kapitalisme dan Teori Sosial Modern: Suatu Analisis terhadap Karya Tulis Marx, Durkheim, Weber, Penerjemah Soeheba Kramadibrata. Jakarta: UI Press.

Greenwood, S. (1990). Émile Durkheim and C. G. Jung: Structuring a Transpersonal Sociology of Religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29(4), 482-495. doi:10.2307/1387313

Hidayati, N. (2014). Masyarakat Menurut Emile Durkheim dan Ferdinand Tonnies. diunduh dari http://nurhidayati494.wordpress.com/2014/03/01/masyarakat-menurut-emile-durkheim-dan-ferdinand-tonnies/

Holil, C. (2014). Biografi Emile Durkheim. Gudang Tugasku. Retrieved from http://gudangtugasku.blogspot.com/2011/05/biografi-emile-durkheim.html

James, P. (2006). Globalism, Nationalism, Tribalism: Bringing Theory Back In —Volume 2 of Towards a Theory of Abstract Community. London: Sage Publications.

Johnson, P., & Duberley, J. (2011). Anomie and culture management: reappraising Durkheim. Organization, 18(4), 563-584.

Koentjaraningrat. (1963). “Review: The Religion of Java, Clifford Geertz”. Pp. 188-191 dalam Majalah Ilmu-Ilmu Sastra Indonesia, I.

Koentjaraningrat. (1985). Beberapa Pokok Antropologi Sosial. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat.

Kusumohamidjojo, B. (2010). Filsafat Kebudayaan. Proses Realisasi Manusia, cet.ke-2. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.

Liliweri, A. (2005). Prasangka dan Konflik: Komunikasi Lintas Budaya Masyarakat Multikultur, LKiS, Yogyakarta.

Mahoney, A., & Pargament, K. I. (2004). Sacred changes: Spiritual conversion and transformation. Journal of clinical psychology, 60(5), 481-492.

Manoussakis, J. (2019). Sacred Addictions: On the Phenomenology of Religious Experience. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 33(1), 41-55. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/jspecphil.33.1.0041

Manoussakis, J. P. (2016). God in the Mind? Religious Phenomena and the Teleology of Consciousness. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, 72(1), 147-168.

Maryanski, A. (2014). The Birth of the Gods: Robertson Smith and Durkheim’s Turn to Religion as the Basis of Social Integration. Sociological Theory, 32(4), 352-376.

Musbikin. (2007). Rahasia Shalat Khusyu’. Yogyakarta: Mitra Pustaka.

Orrù, M., & Wang, A. (1992). Durkheim, Religion, and Buddhism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 31(1), 47-61. doi:10.2307/1386831

Johnson, D. P. (1986). Teori Sosiologi Klasik dan Modern, di Indonesiakan oleh Robert M.Z. Lawang. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.

Prus, R. (2011). Examining community life “in the making”: Emile Durkheim’s Moral Education. The American Sociologist, 42(1), 56-111.

Rachman, M. F. (2007). Shalat khusyu’ enjoy aja! Jakarta: Gema Insani Press.

Richards, W. A. (2008). The phenomenology and potential religious import of states of consciousness facilitated by psilocybin. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 30(1), 189-200.

Ritzer, & Goodman. (2003). The Sociological Theory. McGraw Hill.

Sangkan, A. (2011). Gerakan Little Madinah. Retrieved from http://kanguri.wordpress.com/2011/01/24/gerakan-little-madinah/

Sarwono, S. W. (2005). Psikologi Sosial: Psikologi Kelompok dan Psikologi Terapan, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta.

Setiawan, R. (2014). Solidaritas Mekanik ke Solidaritas Organik (Suatu Ulasan Singkat Pemikiran Emile Durkheim). Retrieved from http://riset.umrah.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Solidaritas-mekanik-ke-solidaritas-organik.pdf

Sleigh, J. (2017). Google A Religion: Expanding Notions of Religion Online. In Frömming U., Köhn S., Fox S., &

Terry M. (Eds.), Digital Environments: Ethnographic Perspectives Across Global Online and Offline Spaces (pp. 251-262). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1xxrxw.20

Smith, D. N. (2017). Collectivism and the Intellectuals: Svend Ranulf, Émile Durkheim, Fascism, and Resistance. Antisemitism Studies, 1(2), 305-351.

Soekanto, S. (2006). Sosiologi : suatu pengantar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Spradley, J., & McCurdy, D. W. (Eds.). (2012). Conformity and Conflict: Readings in Cultural Anthropology. Longman.

Suprayogo, I. (2001). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial-Agama. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Therik, W. (2014). Mengenal Sosiologi Emile Durkheim. Retrieved from http://wilsontherikreportage.wordpress.com/2014/02/13/mengenal-sosiologi-emile-durkheim/

Thiwidmep. (2014). Hubungan Sosial Asosiatif. Retrieved from http://id.shvoong.com/social-sciences/sociology/2300990-hubungan-sosial-asosiatif/

Wallace, A. F.C., (1966). Religion: An Anthropological View, Random House Inc., New York.

Weyher, L. F. (2012). Emotion, rationality, and everyday life in the sociology of Emile Durkheim. Sociological Spectrum, 32(4), 364-383.

Williamson, W. P., & Hood Jr, R. W. (2011). Spirit baptism: A phenomenological study of religious experience. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 14(6), 543-559.

Zinnbauer, B. J., & Camerota, E. C. (2004). THE SPIRITUALITY GROUP: A SEARCH FOR THE SACRED. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 36(1).
Published
2019-05-20
How to Cite
MUSTOFA, Farrid. Religion, Identity and Solidarity: Emile Durkheim's Perspective. JURNAL PENELITIAN, [S.l.], p. 65-78, may 2019. ISSN 2541-6944. Available at: <http://e-journal.iainpekalongan.ac.id/index.php/Penelitian/article/view/1833>. Date accessed: 20 july 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.28918/jupe.v16i1.1833.
Section
Artikel